Partial Sick Leave Reform Nears as German Courts Crack Down on Faked Medical Certificates

Germany introduces graded sick leave (25-100%) for long-term illnesses, with projected savings of €40M by 2027. Court rulings highlight strict penalties for abuse but robust protection for honest employees.

Germany is preparing to introduce a partial sick?leave certificate – a legislative change that would let doctors grade a patient’s incapacity for work in 25, 50, 75 or 100 percent increments. The plan, unveiled by Health Minister Nina Warken, applies only to illnesses expected to last four weeks or longer. Both the employee and employer must agree before a reduced?duty arrangement can take effect. The government projects savings of 40 million euros in 2027, climbing to 160 million by 2030. Passage is scheduled before the summer recess of 2026.

The reform coincides with a series of labor?court rulings that show how swiftly judges can act when a sick?note is abused – and how robust the protection remains for those who tell the truth.

Advertisement

Just as German labour courts are swift to act on sick-note abuse, UK employers also face serious consequences when health and safety compliance slips. Many businesses unknowingly operate without essential documentation, risking fines and legal action. A free Health & Safety Toolkit provides ready-to-use risk assessments, checklists, and templates that help you meet UK regulations and protect your workforce. Download the free Health & Safety Toolkit

In one striking example, the Frankfurt Appellate Labor Court upheld the summary dismissal of a 50?year?old employee whom a private detective caught renovating a property. The man had taken on a paid assignment during his sick leave and told the client he was ill and therefore available. The court ruled the trust relationship was irreparably broken.

But a different outcome awaited an employer who fired a nurse earning 4,350 euros gross per month. The Schleswig?Holstein Appellate Labor Court, in a January 2026 ruling, found that neither switching doctors nor moving seamlessly to a new job could undermine the evidentiary value of a medical certificate. The nurse had described her illness in detail and named her treating physicians as witnesses. The dismissal was declared void.

A separate case from the Cologne Appellate Labor Court involved a bus driver who gave false statements during a wrongful?dismissal hearing. On 15 January 2026, the judges ruled that a deliberate lie in court constitutes an independent ground for a new ordinary termination – without any prior warning. The driver had claimed he reported trip cancellations by phone, later admitted the untruth.

Procedural missteps, however, can still save even a seemingly guilty worker. The Bochum Labor Court, on 9 March 2026, threw out three dismissals of an auditor whose employer suspected time?sheet fraud. The company had failed to fully inform the works council about smart?work rules that allowed up to 60 percent mobile work and had also let the two?week deadline for suspicion?based dismissals expire.

German appellate courts apply an even stricter standard to senior staff. The Berlin?Brandenburg Appellate Labor Court upheld the summary firing of an office manager at broadcaster RBB who earned roughly 180,000 euros a year. She had approved an invoice of nearly 14,000 euros without proper scrutiny; the court saw no need for a warning because of her role?model function. Similarly, the Offenbach Labor Court ruled that a chief legal officer who mishandled whistleblower reports about illegal practices could be dismissed without a warning, given the potential millions in provisions that the company faced as a result.

Advertisement

German courts set a high bar for senior staff, and in the UK, directors can be personally liable for health and safety breaches. Could your organisation be unknowingly missing compliance with the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974? A free toolkit provides 9 essential tools, including a director's liability guide and compliance checklists, to help you identify gaps and avoid costly penalties. Download the free Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 Toolkit

Employer?wide surveys to investigate suspected sick?leave fraud are permissible, the Lower Saxony Appellate Labor Court made clear in early 2025 – data?protection laws do not block such inquiries. Yet the line remains fine. The burden of proof on the employer is heavy, and only a clear?cut exposure of deceit or a procedural miscalculation can tip the scales one way or the other.