Global Labour Courts Deliver Key Rulings on Remote Work, Political Expression and Workplace Conduct

The Western Cape Labour Court has dismissed a constructive dismissal claim brought by a former technical general manager against a major technology company, ruling that the employee failed to prove…

The Western Cape Labour Court has dismissed a constructive dismissal claim brought by a former technical general manager against a major technology company, ruling that the employee failed to prove working conditions had become intolerable.

In a judgment delivered on July 11, 2026, Judge Tapiwa Gandize found that the plaintiff's decision to resign was premature. The employee submitted his resignation on July 15, 2022, but a psychologist's report regarding the workplace situation was not available until three days later. Judge Gandize emphasised that the timing was fatal to the case, as insufficient evidence was presented to establish that the work environment met the legal threshold for intolerable conditions required for a constructive dismissal claim.

Advertisement

This ruling highlights how critical it is for employers to document safe and compliant working conditions. Many UK businesses face similar challenges without the right tools. A free Health & Safety Toolkit provides ready-to-use risk assessments, checklists, and templates covering the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 and other regulations. Download the free Health & Safety Toolkit

Irish Tribunal Upholds Dismissal for Unauthorised Remote Work

The South African ruling coincides with several other high-profile labour decisions across international jurisdictions this week. In Ireland, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) upheld the dismissal of a senior associate at PwC on July 11, 2026. Adjudicator Niamh O'Carroll ruled that the firm fairly terminated Jasch Asher for a fundamental breach of contract. Records showed Asher had been working remotely from India since late September 2024 without authorisation, while his office was based in Dublin.

Australian Court Backs Orchestra Over Political Speech Dismissal

In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on July 10, 2026, against concert pianist Jayson Gillham in his unfair dismissal case against the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra. Gillham was terminated in August 2024 following a speech regarding the targeting of journalists. Judge Graeme Hill determined the dismissal was not motivated by the pianist's political beliefs but was instead a measure to protect the orchestra's business interests and maintain its policy of political neutrality.

South African Courts Target Fraud and Medical Boarding Failures

The Western Cape High Court also recently addressed matters of fraud, dismissing an appeal on July 11, 2026, from Mark Bezuidenhout. The court confirmed a 15-year sentence for a June 2022 incident in which Bezuidenhout defrauded a car dealership of R220,000 for a non-existent vehicle while already under correctional supervision for a previous conviction.

In other South African labour developments, the Labour Court ordered the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT) on July 8, 2026, to pay nearly R500,000 in compensation to long-term employee Ferose Samaai. Judge Makhura found the dismissal substantively unfair because the institution failed to explore medical boarding alternatives for the employee, who suffered from significant health issues including anxiety, depression and physical injuries.

Recent rulings from the Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC) have also upheld dismissals for personal and financial misconduct. An arbitrator confirmed the dismissal of Gauteng principal P Bango for using more than R23,000 in school funds for personal electronics and failing to document other significant expenditures. The dismissal of Peter Popela, a campus manager at a TVET college, was also upheld following an investigation into the sexual harassment of a student in August 2023.

Advertisement

These cases remind employers that clear policies and compliance are essential to avoid costly disputes. In the UK, unknowingly violating the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 can lead to serious penalties. A free toolkit helps you identify common compliance gaps with 9 ready-to-use tools including risk assessments and checklists. Get the free Health & Safety at Work Act Toolkit

Canadian and Australian Tribunals Clarify Workplace Boundaries

In Canada, the Ontario Labour Board issued a ruling on July 10, 2026, declaring the firing of a software engineer illegal. The board found the termination was a retaliatory act after the engineer raised concerns regarding unpaid overtime and unrealistic deadlines.

Meanwhile, the Australian Fair Work Commission (FWC) issued a series of decisions on July 10, 2026, reinforcing the right of employers to refuse work-from-home requests on reasonable business grounds. The commission rejected bids from several employees seeking full-time remote work or reduced office days, citing the necessity of in-person mentorship, collaboration and specific operational requirements.